It seemed we had definitively escaped the secessionist danger of Po Valley-Veneto inspiration. Not even for a dream: and today, precisely in the moment of greatest difficulty for the life of the country, it is evident how the dubious and controversial adhesion of Matteo Salvini's party to the "Government of National Unity" hid from the beginning, and hides from current events, the need to manage from the "inside" and as a "master" (and as much as possible "alone" since it is an issue entirely internal to the center-right coalition) the autonomous process of regional importance, opportunely hindered, among the "sayings ”And“ the unspoken ”, during the so-called“ yellow-green ”government experience of“ Conte 1 ”.
The Draghi Government, in fact, as the recent media have punctually represented, with the Economic and Finance Document 2021, wanted to confirm, among the bills linked to the budget law 2022-2024, a certain bill containing "Provisions for the implementation of the differentiated autonomy referred to in Article 116, paragraph 3, of the Constitution ", that is, in essence, he wanted to offer relief to an ordinary law entirely suitable, due to its implications, to compromise the already shaky constitutional balances, and which would become in some way irreversible in its effects, should it affect the budget chapters of the three-year period since, by express provision, pursuant to the provisions of Article 75 of the Constitution, no referendum concerning the tax and budget laws. For the Northern League leader, therefore, the possibility of mending the rift that has arisen with the business world and more generally with his rigid electorate of reference, wounded by the effects of the equal nationalist ambition and homogenizing that had crossed, and somehow canceled, even if only in appearance, the basic identity inspiration of the movement.
In essence, regional autonomy is preparing to become the architrave on which the near future (anti) democratic structure of the Italian country will rest, in open disharmony with the European, but not pro-European, trend of the moment. In the meantime, because, to critically observe the work of the President of the Council of Ministers in office, the complete implementation of the "differentiated autonomy" process seems to constitute the real key to the entire action of "Government of National Unity", the answer dissonant and contradictory with respect to the institutional mutations that will intervene as a result of the waning of the absolutist effects of the stainless era Merkel. Therefore, because, as repeatedly stressed, the circumstance, in and of itself considered, appears to be confirmed even in terms of the composition of the team of Ministers, all largely an expression of an exasperated and aristocratic "northernism" that will not fail to reverberate the its effects even on the territorial administrative structure of the country, sectorialising and fragmenting the intervention measures currently unexpressed due to the lack of a Programming Project to which to make unanimous reference. Finally, because evidently, the State-Regions Conference itself, in its position as an agreed synthesis of the power expressed by the various territorial executives, and as the undisputed protagonist, in terms of practical implementation, of emergency intervention measures throughout the entire year 2020, has gradually contributed to delegitimizing the Parliament, effectively depriving it of the decision-making capacity that should have been its own.
