With the nadef 2021, the Update Note to the Economics and Finance Document recently defined by the "government of the best", it was decided to operate, through the usual and devious "night hand", an addition anything but desired concerning the hateful “ddl - Provisions for the implementation of the Differentiated Autonomy as per Art. 116, paragraph 3, of the Constitution "
The danger for the stability of the country and for its harmonic growth (examined several times by the undersigned on several occasions) is therefore far from being imaginary and, considering the parliamentary dynamics of recent months, qualifiable in the reductive terms of functional non-existence, we seriously risk hearing the approval of a regulation which, in the absence of any appropriate corrective measures, and with good likelihood, will contribute to increasing the gap that already exists between the three macro-areas of the country, or between the North, South, and Insular Italy.
The “Italietta” of the three speeds and alternating and alternative currents continues, in short, to exist and to resist in total disregard of every constitutional principle, deliberately and improperly “disapplied” to the benefit of the “rich man” from the north. Power generates power: you know. It is the law of the strongest shamefully elevated to a "rule of government" which, indeed, does not seem to know any setbacks but rather consolidates hand in hand with the increasing state of need of the unfortunate on duty. Let's understand each other better rules in hand but without falling into unnecessary complications. The feeling that governs the common feeling perceives the next and imminent theft of resources and funds to the detriment of the South and the Islands as urgent. Meanwhile, because article 179 of the Budget Law licensed by Mario Draghi, entitled "Provisions concerning the methods for the allocation of Lep resources to be assigned to Local Authorities", deliberately generic and generalist, is greatly lacking both in terms of formality and content to the first directly attributable, as it fails to indicate, as appropriately observed by several parties, not only the so-called criteria relating to the services to be provided and also their related costs, but also seriously omits to provide any and, to be honest, necessary funds, for the functional implementation of the equalization mechanisms. Therefore, because an "oversight" of such importance and consistency is anything but admissible on the part of the Technician par Excellence of the recent Italian political context who would seem to want to rely, on the specific point on the agenda, on pure and simple opinion of a not better defined "Technical Commission for Standard Requirements".
