Concreteness, or just easy enthusiasm with respect to expected results but remained in a state of power? More precisely: with respect to the migration issue, what has been decided in Luxembourg in recent days? Has Italy, in the presence of the Interior Ministers of the various member countries, finally "turned around", or was it a pure and simple manifestation of intent which, however appreciable in the attempt, has changed nothing compared to the contingent moment? What is the substantial content of the agreement that would have been reached at that meeting? Has the Dublin Treaty been modified, have mandatory derogating measures been taken, or have supplementary “notes” been drawn up?
According to what was possible to learn from the most accredited "media", and with the exception of Hungary and Poland, expressing a vote against, and Malta, Slovakia, Lithuania and Bulgaria, which abstained, the remaining Interior Ministers of the European Union would have reached an agreement on the new "Migration Pact", consisting, it would seem, of a complex architecture of measures that would purport to reform both the so-called right of asylum and the management of the phenomenon.
It does not seem to be known whether that agreement was sealed in writing, or if, instead, as it would seem, it was a verbal exchange whose strength will recover (if it recovers it) its binding operation in the near future.
Even if we want to disregard the perplexities indicated, a basic sensation would indeed seem to impose itself: the different drives exerted by the succession of diversified emergency situations, multiple in their manifestation, and pressing in their pressure, would seem to favor the exercise of a government, such as precisely the current one led by Meloni who, precisely on the basis of urgency and necessity (which does not seem to be the migratory one, but rather the one centered on the prevailing economic crisis), would tend to its own strengthening along the lines of a pseudo-liberal approach based on the need , if real it will be necessary to wait to ascertain it, to protect the safety of the populations involved in the transformation process, as well as their development. However, the point would seem to arise, and moreover, on another aspect, namely on the effective novelty of this agreement reached in Luxembourg.
