We receive and publish a contribution from the regional councilor for Local Authorities, Finance and Urban Planning Quirico Sanna.
“Dear Director, I would like to take advantage of your kindness and the authority of your newspaper to make a subdued reflection on what was ruled by the Excellency Constitutional Court with sentence no. 257/2021.
'.. The sentence of the Constitutional Court 257/2021, was adopted with the affirmation of the illegitimacy of the regional law as it stated that the Region was obliged, with the 2007 Agreement and then with the implementing regulations of 2013 and 2018, approved by the Regional Councils of the time, to carry out, for the revision of the PPR, a co-planning with the Ministry: not having done it consequently led to the declaration of illegitimacy of art. 1 of law 21/2020, on the interpretation of the PPR legislation.
The ruling also recalls that in these acts, signed by the Region, it is also envisaged that the adjustment of the PPR must take place in an organic and not episodic way, and that this is also affirmed by the regional laws that dealt with this problem, including LR 4 / 2009, on the first floor of the house.
The Court's decision is therefore based almost exclusively on the failure to respect the principle of loyal cooperation that would derive from the so-called 2007 Agreement, and on the new principle agreed with the Region of the so-called “organic revision”, albeit in derogation from constitutional norms.
However, the ruling on the existence or otherwise of an exclusive legislative power of the Region of Sardinia in the matter of landscape protection, which had been affirmed by the Constitutional Court with sentence no. 51/2006, according to which "it is clear that the Region of Sardinia also has the power to intervene in relation to landscape-environmental protection profiles in the exercise of its statutory powers in the field of building and urban planning".











