The time for the great electoral appointment of the Sardinia Region is approaching: in nine months , if we want to consider the natural expiry date of the mandate received at the time, and barring far from unexpected surprises, which could well fall within the dynamics of the programmatic tactics of one, and/or both, of the two contending coalitions, since they are respectively ready to take advantage of the condition of mutual internal inhomogeneity of the party components respectively concerned, the ballot boxes and the various alignments on the field will reopen, aware of the relevance of the choice that the Sardinian people will be called to complete in the aftermath of a not exactly idyllic five-year period, they would seem to begin to "position themselves" at the starting line .
Saying "nine months", in the political sphere, is in practice equivalent to saying "tomorrow" and the circumstance, on closer consideration, can only arouse, with a good approximation, significant concerns on an organizational level due to the key decisions to be taken on the matter the composition of the various lists and the choice of the candidate for President who, more than anyone else, will have to express subjective qualities such as to be able to catalyze the preference of the citizens. And that this figure cannot, in any way, be indicated as "aliunde", and least of all in Rome, really appears as the proverbial "minimum wage" not requiring, in theory and even in practice, any clarifications whatsoever.
The candidate, on both sides, will have to express, give concreteness it would perhaps be more correct to say, to those who are the requests of a population which, like that of the national context, will be called to meet the challenges, and the difficulties, already existing and strongly incident, of the post-pandemic years, and beyond, therefore it will have to make itself a humble expression of a People who will have to place every best future expectation on its decisions.
The novelty is that there would be a need for "novelty", "originality" in the conduct of party decision-making, and, above all, a decisive generational change of the ruling class because, as we know, being the golden rule, "changing the order of the addends , the sum does not change”.
