But it still makes sense, today, to continue even just to discuss the conflict in Ukraine , of the need to guarantee the latter from the fatal results of a " special military operation " already written in their painful epilogue and whose effects, on a large scale intended , have contributed, and contribute in an overwhelming way, to drag us all into a bottomless abyss ?
Maybe it's just my impression, but I can't help but point out that civil society, the one that daily finds itself dealing with everyday life and with all its economic and health difficulties, is beginning to manifest a certain sense of tiredness and intolerance towards everything that, in any way, contributes to increasing the already present sense of internal and international instability. And Volodymyr Zelensky, with his demands, with the pressing carried out at a rapid pace on the West and its very weak leaders, would seem to emerge, in the eyes of populations tired and fatigued by the past two years of pandemic, almost like a paradigmatic "disturbing element "To be filed as soon as possible.
If my impression had, as I believe it has, a strong sense of verisimilitude, then it would not be pure and simple selfishness, but only a healthy and understandable sense of community survival , especially the European ones, increasingly convinced, and probably rightly so. , that their governments, perhaps due to their manifest inability and ineptitude, are too attentive to the war and the needs of the so-called "attacked" to the detriment of the well-being of their administrators and their contingent needs.
Even if I want to concede and / or understand everything, I am sure, and I do not think I make a mistake, that what remains of the Italian and European political theater will end up paying the price for any further imprudent adherence to the reasons for a "third" conflict in the the context of which "nobody", and I say "nobody", seems to have seriously engaged in the search for peace.
Let us be clear, however, in order to avoid misunderstandings and distorting interpretations. The problems are all revealed in terms of dialectics and verbal exchange between peoples whose contents, far from expressing, if anything, the understandably supportive attitude towards the Ukrainian population, forced in spite of itself to leave their land and their homes, is it reveals in all its instrumental opportunism as an imaginative "means" to try to defeat Russia even if it does not see itself as "how" and "why". A , it is evident, which would seem to be useful only to mystify a to admit before even telling. That is to say that for which, mutatis mutandis, the is with good verisimilitude the of a battle wanted "elsewhere" only to try to satiate the appetites of "who knows who" who has any interest in doing "nationalistic divisionism" an instrument of growing expansion. And certainly not by chance.
