Story after story, the one on the Russian-Ukrainian conflict seems to have become a spurious truth with uncertain outlines. That Volodymyr Zelensky , now dropped into his role as a leading actor, appears to have exchanged Ukraine and what remains of that today, or does not remain, for a film set, might seem, to the most critical eyes, a very sad truth that is difficult to admit. . That the onset of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict (to which our "insipid" Rainbow Government felt it had to adhere in defense of democratic principles that should be the first to undertake to recover) has favored the pathological increase in prices, already characterized by a very strong speculative pressure, it does not seem that it can be revoked in doubt. That from the first day of the conflict an " imposed uni-directional thought " has come to be, articulated according to the opposing logic of good / bad regardless, with the claim, even ridiculous in the drama of its effects, to take hold of the side of just claims, it is likewise a circumstance demonstrated by the evolution of events in the context of which the expression, even if motivated, of a different opinion, is represented as "criminal adherence" to the reasons of the person who, for no good reason, someone (perhaps too aware, on the contrary, of his own inconsistency, otherwise he would not explain himself) likes to define Tsar.
In short, the unconditional support given by "Atlantist" Westernism to Ukraine (formally a third country, like the Russian Federation, with respect to the Old Continent) on the somewhat distorting and deformed assumption that the defense of those borders represents the defense of our own borders, appears rather singular, since, and moreover, offered in the absence of any contextual intervention useful to put a concrete barrier to the speculation reconnected to it, whose devastating effects are already reverberating at the internal national level of the countries involved in various ways in military operations, irremediably affecting their respective populations, and more generally they are reverberating globally.
Just as the pre-judicial criticism of those who ask for the immediate suspension of war activities appears rather singular, almost as if to accuse pro-Putinism (which, unlike what is convenient for some to believe, is not a bad word anyway), whatever citizen, columnist, commentator, or simply a skeptic, who has the audacity to express some perplexity about the opportunity of an all-out line-up that, if we want to concede everything, qualifies us in the frightening terms of a . Perhaps you are really afraid to admit it: but we are facing a "war of attrition" on the front line that appears far from finding its epilogue and which will be rather complex to justify when it reaches the fateful point of no return, since the he idea of being able to weaken Russia on the ground by letting the passage of time conclude a "mission impossible" that the mighty "Allies" cannot or do not want to conclude, appears in all its naive illusion. Without considering, moreover, that the only is above all that suffered by the citizens of the adhering countries, left without effective instruments of economic compensation useful for making the deployment in favor of Atlanticism and its ideals. In a nutshell: if support for Ukraine must result in the incontrovertible economic mortification of all Italians, Germans, French and Europeans, as well as Africans, then it is clear that that same support, even if ideologically motivated (although admitted and granted that it is), it cannot go on indefinitely and cannot continue to be imposed.
