Only the specter of Russian interference in the Italian democratic process was missing to shake the waters of a "sui generis" electoral campaign, very poor in content and, for this very reason, not very attractive in the context of the dynamics that regulate, or should regulate, inspiration to vote. But, on balance, and considering the Italian party situation in recent years, is it really a concrete, tangible, current and, above all, decisive danger?
Is the potential and / or ideal interference of the Russian government in the context of the Italian elections really worrying ? Or is it rather one of the usual ploys to try to "get rid of" a "right" that it would like to propose to be, but, to be honest, it seems to greatly lack precisely those elements of renewal of a political thought that should aspire to "progressivism" in order to relive in the democratic circuit while respecting its pregnant values?
Beyond the answers that each of us wants to mature in the depths of our consciences, and / or the likelihood of the concerns mentioned above, if we wanted to fully understand the dynamics, even perverse, that regulate electoral processes in their complexity, we will not be able to deviate from some general reflections.
Meanwhile, the one for which not the Russians in particular, but rather the crisis generated by the coronavirus pandemic has contributed to exacerbate the eternal struggle between "democracy" and "authoritarianism" , in the context of which, the various state and para- variously "authoritarian" states have been able to field "tools" of various types, even of an economic nature, useful for destabilizing and weakening the democratic forces of the system. Therefore, the one for which the attention to the probable or unlikely foreign interference, which has progressively increased due to the need to find a justification for the inability of the current Western democracies to cope with the "changing" structures of world power, ended with the to represent only the pale reflection of a decoy, sickened by the wear of time.
Finally, the fear that "foreign players", or rather some of them, could affect the mechanisms of national power management of individual Member States of the Union, transforming the salient characteristics of liberal democracies into de-qualification factors , it would seem, ended up being used by to give substance to an electoral message too lukewarm and inconclusive to be able to break the "wall of silence" of the electoral body.











