Of course, the fibrillations that at varying intensity promise to shake further, and probably definitively, the newly born Meloni Government (if you really and truly will be our President of the Council of Ministers) do not surprise us or should surprise us, and they were in the air from the very first stages of the electoral campaign that preceded the vote on 25 September.
And if in a situation of "normality" (provided that in a country like ours a "normality" has ever existed in the period that extends from the end of the First Republic to the present day), these fibrillations would represent, no more, no less, pure and simple aftershocks useful for the discovery of "coexistence agreements" between the political forces in the field, in the present condition characterized by all the post-pandemic and current war emergencies undoubtedly constitute very dangerous signs of dialectical dystonia capable of compromising not only the power relations that came to determine at the outcome of the vote, but also, and above all, every credibility on the relational and international level of the country, exposed as always and more than ever not only to the incandescent criticism from the European institutions and the most accredited Chancelleries, but also to the “controlled administration” exercised by the Atlantic Ally, wholly interested in conser to have its influence on the Mediterranean area as a privileged observatory and hub for any relationship with the Middle-Eastern macro-area.
In short, and to keep it very short, we can manage and dominate the entire contingent situation and the potential duration (if it can see the light) of the Meloni Government only and only if the leader in pectore shows herself up to the task and role. that will be entrusted to it, managing to find a strong balance point between the contradictions of an extemporaneous Atlanticism still watered down by imperialism and nationalism and the alternating phases of a changing Europeanism which, all in all, contrasts with the first, on a semantic level even, in an attempt to proposing itself as an alternative ideology, albeit still complementary to it.
Yes: because after all the Atlanticist choice, although historically motivated in various ways, has never been "paid" as in this moment and we are "paying" dearly for it, not only in the bill but also with reference to the shopping cart ( more empty every day) and in general in everyday life. A circumstance, the latter, on reflection, is paradoxical, in the sense that if a sacrifice is required of us by virtue of that "covenant", then that same "covenant", if it really had been and were such, should have and should keep us unharmed as much as less from the prejudicial consequences of a radical choice made in the context of a conflict totally foreign to us and which, to be honest, we would have gladly done without.
