Three hours spent inside the room where Cinzia Pinna was murdered, technical surveys, measurements, and verification of the blood sampling points with Emanuele Ragnedda's genetic profile. Expert consultant Dario Redaelli has worked extensively in the Conca Entosa house, and now the objective of Ragnedda's defense is clear. After this morning's inspection (the defense's ballistics expert visited the crime scene for the first time), a new twist has emerged in the investigation into Cinzia Pinna's murder.
Emanuele Ragnedda openly claims to have shot the woman because he was afraid of being killed and the defense consultants, Dario Redaelli and Ernesto D'Aloja, have the task of finding evidence to support the thesis of criminal lawyers Luca Montella and Gabriele Satta.
The feeling these days is that the possibility of alleged self-defense is on the table. Ragnedda would have found himself facing an out-of-control individual, in the throes of a fit of rage, a riotous reaction like others she'd had in her past. The defense's argument is that the Arzachena businessman perceived the situation as life-threatening and fired several shots.
Ragnedda was allegedly stabbed in the mouth. This, according to rumors, is the defense's counterargument, supported primarily by Dario Redaelli, a key figure (as a criminologist and forensic ballistics expert) in the Garlasco and Yara Gambirasio cases. Redaelli left Palau, without making a statement, and met with Emanuele Ragnedda in Bancali prison.