Understanding what lies behind the criminal acts conducted to the detriment of so many women is not at all simple, and the urgency of "having", and "having" to intervene to put a significant barrier to a criminal and deforming "socio-cultural phenomenon" in continuous growth, induces significant reflections, although sometimes rather bitter in their outcomes, as they are inserted in the context of a pathological human context where "prevent", "protect" and "pursue" are equally significant expressions of a dogmatic and juridical paradigm of intervention which to date, unfortunately, despite the undisputed ideological value, fails, on a practical level, to guarantee the safety of potential victims.
Sometimes (at least this is the feeling), the same "narration" that arises from it appears as severely "vitiated" by a "schematic" basic spectacle that identifies the "predator", the "master man", like a beast ferocious psychopath (as if the pathology, if it really exists, can justify its action), unable to manage their violent impulses, and the "victim" as "prey" in some way unjustly "co-responsible" (which is simply absurd and misleading) for not being able to and / or for not being able to get out of a one-way circuit of intermittent oppression when not even daily in the most serious cases. A "pre-concept", the latter, evidently distorted to be surprisingly conditioned by the still predominant reflections of a certain sexist cultural matrix that still seems to survive in our communities, too often (perhaps deliberately) "distracted" with respect to phenomena that they should instead be deepened and eradicated through a constant and intense educational work that should start from individual family contexts (paradoxically, the stage of the drama) and consequently extend into schools of all levels.
The circumstance that there are Women despite themselves unable to escape from violent men, to protect themselves from abusive and dominant attitudes by developing a real dysfunctional "dependence" towards them does not at all mean sharing and accepting their work: that inability, most of all sometimes, not to say always, as well as that damned prevaricating instinct represent the implication of an endemic fragility (the female one), and of a suppressed anger (the male one) matured, in turn, in an "original" family context of origin already seriously flawed in the explanation of the most intimate sentimental relationships. Transforming the social fabric of reference, I am aware of, is no small feat, and the process requires inadequate timing with respect to the urgent and contingent need to contain tragic events. The media clamor, then, acting as a sounding board for heinous crimes, solicits, on the level of common feeling, the pure and simple perception of the phenomenon, the rapid response of the proceeding Authorities and Institutions which indeed, very often, fail to carry out the preventive function that should be proper to them since they are almost trapped in a sort of systematic and systemic automatism that "induces" them to provide, and ineffectively, only afterwards and almost never "ex ante", that is, when it would be necessary.
