But how green is this green transition really? The committee for the protection of the territory of Ogliastra has organized a debate meeting in the great hall of the Liceo Da Vinci in Lanusei .
The answers have arrived, clear and strong. Antonio Muscas, engineer, clarified how the companies only care about the authorizations : " Once they have obtained the land and the bodies of water, they have the right to use them sine die, leaving nothing on the territory. Because we cannot consider as compensation (if the landscape had a price) that 3 percent without paying which the plants would continue their march".
Giulia Lai, a lawyer from the No Tyrrenian Link Committee in Quartu , expressed her anger: «The maximum expression of energy speculation in Sardinia. Terna can do what it wants in the deathly silence of the Quartu administration, even run the cable inside a family home ». Antonio Fronteddu, a young graduate and expert in sustainability, reiterated the importance of committees for contributing to a mature debate on energy. «But we want and must be protagonists of the decisions that concern us. In Sardinia there are virtuous examples, in adversity we find a solution».
Everyone has asked for a framework law that sets principles, a development plan tailored to the needs of Sardinia that goes beyond the "at least 6 Kw" that allowed the attack. Domenico Scanu, of the Isde, doctors for the environment, has reconstructed the dynamics of the environmental injustices that the Sardinian population has to suffer, a third of which lives in a contaminated territory. " We are not against renewables but we are against the method. And the environmental impact assessment must be a priority. The health of the Sardinians must not be negotiable ." In introducing the interventions, Monica Deiana, of the Ogliastra territory protection committee, reconstructed the energy business in Ogliastra and the interventions that loom over the Tacchi d'Ogliastra. Nothing green, let it be clear.
