He does not know why they mentioned his name, but he still assures today - after decades of identical answers - that he is "innocent". He hopes for the revision process underway in Rome but cannot think of a life as a free man: "I live day by day". Never a negative report in prison, he hopes first of all for parole (since 2019 the Surveillance Court of Cagliari is evaluating the request presented by the lawyer Mauro Trogu) and then, in the future, in the recognition of his extraneousness to the accusations that the they brought behind bars.

Beniamino Zuncheddu, 57, in prison for 31 years, spoke of all this yesterday during an interview with the managers of the site "Judicial errors" (journalists Benedetto Lattanzi and Valentino Maimone) in the company of his lawyer. The detainee hopes that "the truth will come out", that is "that I am innocent". The pastor of Burcei was arrested in February 1991: the police had knocked on the door of his home in Burcei ("I was watching television") and asked him to follow him for "investigations". After a night in the police headquarters in Cagliari he was transferred to Buoncammino. According to the prosecutor, he had killed three people on the evening of the previous 8 January in the fold under the antennae of Serpeddì. The murderer had fired a shot at the owner Gesuino Fadda, 57, from Sinnai, then killed his son Giuseppe, who was 25, and finally killed the pastor Ignazio Pusceddu. Crimes committed at the height of a very strong tension between breeders linked to the trespassing of livestock. On the one hand, those who lived in Cuile is Coccus, the Faddas; on the other hand those who managed Masone Scusa, the Burcerese including Zuncheddu. The killer thought he had also eliminated Luigi Pinna, Fadda's son-in-law, but the boy had survived and after a month he had indicated to the investigators just the pastor of Burcei as responsible. Recognition at the basis of life imprisonment. Today the review process is underway, which sees at the center some statements of the survivor: intercepted, two years ago he spoke with his wife about the intervention of a policeman in the investigation into the massacre and his decision to show him the photo of Zuncheddu as possible responsible before the interrogation with the prosecutor. An episode which, according to the lawyer Trogu and the former attorney general Francesca Nanni, co-signatories of the request for revision, made the testimony false. And also the queen test.